| 1 |
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:36:20 +0100, Sebastian Pipping <sping@g.o> |
| 2 |
wrote: |
| 3 |
> Hello! |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> By default layman currently stores overlays into |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> /usr/local/portage/layman |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> (was /usr/portage/local/layman before that). |
| 11 |
> As of bug 253725 [1] that's not without problems. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I don't think it should be changed again. It is quite annoying to have to |
| 14 |
hunt down where the $next layman location is. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Why can't layman create /usr/local/portage/layman at runtime if it doesn't |
| 17 |
exist and then you can remove the keepdir line from the ebuild?? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-Jeremy |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> I would like to get it right with the next switch. |
| 23 |
> Would |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> /var/lib/layman |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> do well? /var/cache/layman seems inadequate as it might not be |
| 28 |
> regenerated [2] without losses (as upstream moves along). |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> Would be great to hear a few opinions. Thanks! |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> Sebastian |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/253725 |
| 38 |
> [2] http://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/filesystem/index.html |
Archives