Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 14:16, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 01 April 2004 04:05 am, Spider wrote:
> > I'm growing a bit tired of all you folks you consiously brak the tree
> > and introduce update-blockers by not re-generating Manifest files when
> > you commit.
>
> i'm probably the biggest person who does this ... and the reason i mentioned
> before is that manifests mean nothing ...
> the 'security' they were designed to offer is non existent and as such, i
> never felt they were worth regenerating
>
> if we had, say signed manifests, i would most def make sure to use all the
> proper tools to make sure the packages were signed properly ...
> -mike
>
> --
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
The problem is that FEATURES="strict" exists and is documented, so
things will cause breakage, I believe, if the Manifests contain false
information.
I wonder if the infrastructure team are able to arrange it so that
commits without repoman simply won't be allowed..
--
Seemant Kulleen
Developer and Project Co-ordinator,
Gentoo Linux http://dev.gentoo.org/~seemant
Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x3458780E
Key fingerprint = 23A9 7CB5 9BBB 4F8D 549B 6593 EDA2 65D8 3458 780E
|
| Attachment: |
|
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part)
|
|
