Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Joshua Kinard <kumba@g.o>
Subject: Re: x32 fun pants
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 19:28:55 -0400
On 09/15/2011 16:33, Mike Frysinger wrote:

> the sizeof(long) and sizeof(void*) are the same between x86 and x32.  however, 
> that's about the only thing.  for example, x32 gets access to 64bit registers 
> when working with 64bit types (long long) and the tuple is x86_64-pc-linux-
> gnu.  in general, it seems to be closer to amd64 than x32.
> -mike

Virtually the exact same for MIPS n32 ABI.  Needs a 64bit kernel, needs a
mips64-*-linux-gnu toolchain, but the output is a hybrid 32bit/64bit binary.

I wonder if procps ever resolved that PAGE_SIZE mess internally when we
brought the o32/n32/n64 mess to light with its author?

Joshua Kinard
4096R/D25D95E3 2011-03-28

"The past tempts us, the present confuses us, the future frightens us.  And
our lives slip away, moment by moment, lost in that vast, terrible in-between."

--Emperor Turhan, Centauri Republic

signature.asc (OpenPGP digital signature)
x32 fun pants
-- Mike Frysinger
Re: x32 fun pants
-- Michał Górny
Re: x32 fun pants
-- Mike Frysinger
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: x32 fun pants
Next by thread:
Re: x32 fun pants
Previous by date:
Re: udev and /usr
Next by date:
Re: x32 fun pants

Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.