Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: Dar-Klajid <dar@...>
From: Spider <spider@g.o>
Subject: Re: Downgrade from gnome 2.2 to gnome 1.4 with emerge -u world?
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 12:59:56 +0100
begin  quote
On 27 Feb 2003 11:35:24 +0100
Dar-Klajid <dar@...> wrote:

> Thanks for this answer, but isn't it strange that portage calls this a
> downgrade? Perhaps the "D" should be Slot-specific?
> After all this seems to be an upgrade of the gnome1.4-slot, right?
> 

yes, this appears to be malworking in how portage displays such status
notes, please let the portage developers know :)

//Spider

--
begin  .signature
This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature!
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
end
Attachment:
pgpMMF8pOAYYx.pgp (PGP signature)
References:
Portage-2.0.47-r4 -- Testing
-- Nick Jones
Re: Portage-2.0.47-r4 -- Testing
-- Brian Jackson
Downgrade from gnome 2.2 to gnome 1.4 with emerge -u world?
-- Benjamin Podszun
Re: Downgrade from gnome 2.2 to gnome 1.4 with emerge -u world?
-- Spider
Re: Downgrade from gnome 2.2 to gnome 1.4 with emerge -u world?
-- Dar-Klajid
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Downgrade from gnome 2.2 to gnome 1.4 with emerge -u world?
Next by thread:
Replacing qmail's ebuild
Previous by date:
[BUG]gentoo's gtk+-1.2.10 have problem with XFree 4.3
Next by date:
Re: Portage metadata


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.