1 |
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 08:34 +0200, Natanael Copa wrote: |
2 |
> If the "proxy maintainer" is specified as contact person in the ebuild, |
3 |
> and will be added to the CC list on bugs posted, the official developer |
4 |
> will not need to care about it until he gets a response from the proxy |
5 |
> developer. |
6 |
|
7 |
Well, look at sys-auth/bioapi. The ebuild is written (and maintained) |
8 |
by an ex-developer, SeJo. He sends me the updates, and I commit them. |
9 |
About the only thing that I do is run them through repoman and check |
10 |
that they're not doing fun things like "rm -rf /" in pkg_preinst. ;] |
11 |
|
12 |
Of course, they're super-new, so there's no bugs, but once a bug gets |
13 |
filed on it, I'll be sure that SeJo is added to CC, if he isn't added by |
14 |
the bug wrangler. At that point, I'll expect him to fix it. In the |
15 |
end, *I* am ultimately responsible for the package, since I am the |
16 |
developer that "maintains" it, but the workload on me is minimal, at |
17 |
most. |
18 |
|
19 |
> But I'd like to do official portage and not any overlay. I have |
20 |
> submitted ebuilds to bugzilla that ended up in an overlay somehwere (bug |
21 |
> got closed) and has dissapeared for ever. I can't post bugs about |
22 |
> overlays in bugzilla, (I suppose) so no updated ebuild have been |
23 |
> submitted and I ended up just running my own local overlay. |
24 |
|
25 |
If your package was added to an overlay and the bug was closed, it was |
26 |
closed in error. Bug reports (unless they pertain to an overlay itself) |
27 |
don't get closed until the bug is "FIXED" in the main tree. |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
Chris Gianelloni |
31 |
Release Engineering Strategic Lead |
32 |
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams |
33 |
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee |
34 |
Gentoo Foundation |