| 1 |
Tom Payne <gentoo@××××××××.org> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> If a package can be built with either ghc or nhc then use a USE variable |
| 4 |
> (nhc?) to choose which compiler. Since ghc seems more widely used than nhc I |
| 5 |
> suggest the USE variable: |
| 6 |
> nhc Use nhc in preference to ghc where possible |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> e.g. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> IUSE="nhc" |
| 11 |
> DEPEND="virtual/haskell-compiler" |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Whatever you guys come up with, please see if you can get it to map |
| 15 |
into our Lisp and Scheme stuff too. I'll happily help out with the |
| 16 |
scheme and lisp stuff. For Lisp we have (currently): gcl, clisp, |
| 17 |
cmucl, sbcl and ecls. For Scheme we have bigloo, drscheme, gauche, |
| 18 |
kawa, guile, plt, mzschme scheme48 and scsh. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> [Side note: is it OK for two installed packages to provide the same |
| 21 |
> virtual?] |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I *think* it is okay, as I often have both app-editors/emacs and |
| 24 |
app-editors/emacs-cvs installed at the same time (both provide |
| 25 |
virtual/emacs). |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Matt |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Matthew Kennedy |
| 31 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives