1 |
On 2 October 2011 13:50, Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On 10/02/2011 02:44 AM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: |
3 |
[...] |
4 |
>> Bug 361181 is certainly on my TODO list, just not very high up to now. |
5 |
>> If you think that there is some urgency in getting rid of the package, |
6 |
>> please do explain so in advance. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> The time ran out with opening of http://bugs.gentoo.org/384733 for |
9 |
> linux-headers reverse deps to be tracked stable. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> I've removed qutecom for you again. |
12 |
|
13 |
Removing the package again seems to just be unnecessary when the |
14 |
maintainer has stated that he'll fix the problem. Would masking it |
15 |
till it was fixed not suffice? Seems like a bit unjustified to me |
16 |
(from information on this thread alone). |
17 |
|
18 |
Cheers, |
19 |
-- |
20 |
Arun Raghavan |
21 |
http://arunraghavan.net/ |
22 |
(Ford_Prefect | Gentoo) & (arunsr | GNOME) |