Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
On 12 April 2010 15:22, Arun Raghavan <ford_prefect@g.o> wrote:
> On 12 April 2010 18:49, George Prowse <george.prowse@...> wrote:
>> On 12/04/2010 14:17, Arun Raghavan wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12 April 2010 18:43, George Prowse<george.prowse@...> wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>> If you are arguing that the name is ambiguous then I think you are wrong.
>>>> Gentoo knows about the unofficial wiki and knows it's mission is to help
>>>> Gentoo and not to hinder it. Gentoo hardly makes a habit of Apple-like
>>>> litigation when trying to protect it's logo.
>>>
>>> I think the argument is that the wiki is not always accurate, and if
>>> perceived as the official documentation, can put is in bad light.
>>>
>> There is *always* a chance of that, official or otherwise
>
> Which the Wiki team should really be addressing before making a
> world-editable wiki.
If you're talking about the offical wiki, we are addressing that
problem. If you are talking about the unofficial one, I can only
agree.
Cheers,
--
Ben de Groot
Gentoo Qt project lead developer
Gentoo Wiki project lead
|
|
