Archives
Archives
| From: | Greg KH <gregkh@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012] | ||
| Date: | Wed, 09 May 2012 18:33:01 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20120509183203.GA27545@kroah.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012] by Steven J Long |
||
| 1 | On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 02:40:41AM +0100, Steven J Long wrote: |
| 2 | > OFC you could just assure us that udev will never rely on systemd as a |
| 3 | > design decision. I can understand that systemd might need close integration |
| 4 | > with the underlying udev implementation[PS]. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Nope, can't make that assurance at all. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Actually, maybe I can make the opposite assurance, let's see what the |
| 9 | future brings... :) |
| 10 | |
| 11 | greg k-h |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012] | Fabio Erculiani <lxnay@g.o> |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012] | Steven J Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk> |