| 1 |
On 02/01/2011 07:35 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hello |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> As you probably know, dotnet team is really small (for now, only |
| 5 |
> Alistair and me are taking care) and some of packages maintained by |
| 6 |
> dotnet team are a headache to maintain. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> For now I would like to drop dev-dotnet/edtftpnet maintainership |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> The reasons for this are: |
| 11 |
> 1. It's only keyworded on x86 and I mainly use amd64, then, I have never |
| 12 |
> used it. |
| 13 |
> 2. Version is tree is really old, but I haven't tried to bump it since I |
| 14 |
> don't know how to test it works ok. |
| 15 |
> 3. It was added years ago by Jurek and I don't know if any of you uses |
| 16 |
> it :-/ |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Feel free to take it if you wantand, if you want to take any other |
| 19 |
> "dotnet" package, please contact us ;-) |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Or even better, if you want to join dotnet... it would be really |
| 23 |
> appreciated :-D |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Thanks a lot |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Consider also lastriting those dotnet packages that are outdated and |
| 28 |
doesn't get a maintainer (from these mails). |
| 29 |
Ones that you think are not up to speed ebuild (or package) wise. |
| 30 |
It's still better to have nothing, than have crap... ;-) |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
- Samuli |
Archives