| 1 |
On Friday, February 11, 2011 08:44:04 PM Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Friday, February 11, 2011 18:33:32 Alexis Ballier wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Friday, February 11, 2011 05:07:50 PM Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > Il giorno ven, 11/02/2011 alle 16.51 -0300, Alexis Ballier ha scritto: |
| 5 |
> > > > you are seriously considering patching every single package using |
| 6 |
> > > > libpng like |
| 7 |
> > > > this instead of fixing those that fail??? (and i'm not talking about |
| 8 |
> > > > the fact |
| 9 |
> > > > that these patches cannot be upstreamed...) |
| 10 |
> > > |
| 11 |
> > > Why not? We're *not* inventing the libpng15 thing at all... |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > as i read it, it's breaking the libpng.so/pc thing however... |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> so why dont you ask the libpng upstream people ? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
ask what ? |
| 18 |
"pretty please dont install libpng.pc/.so, pretty please force every consumer |
| 19 |
to hardcode the version because i know people that want to do this" ? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Thanks, I'm fine with having it non slotted. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
A. |
Archives