Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:13:00
Message-Id: CAATnKFB3NkiYh2k65i0_nhb=gnuzzeSAUPm=NUN+wpLrkBYHmA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds by Ulrich Mueller
1 On 12 March 2012 22:48, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote:
2 >>>>>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Kent Fredric wrote:
3 > There's little danger if we require the EAPI specification to be in
4 > the first line of the ebuild. Of course the regexp should be general
5 > enough to account for a non-bash comment syntax.
6 >
7
8 There's the obvious case of compiled-binaries where that might not be
9 possible, but thats definately strawman stuff and I wouldn't support
10 that sort of nonsense anyway. Compiled binaries for ebuilds can gtfo.
11
12 --
13 Kent
14
15 perl -e  "print substr( \"edrgmaM  SPA NOcomil.ic\\@tfrken\", \$_ * 3,
16 3 ) for ( 9,8,0,7,1,6,5,4,3,2 );"

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>