Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Thilo Bangert <bangert@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Python-3.2-related changes
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 08:12:05
Message-Id: 201002090910.29098.bangert@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Python-3.2-related changes by Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
1 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <Arfrever@g.o> said:
2 > 2010-02-06 17:54:10 Mark Loeser napisał(a):
3 > > Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <Arfrever@g.o> said:
4 > > > 2010-02-05 17:40:00 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis napisał(a):
5 > > > > I consider filing bugs for not adjusted packages after some
6 > > > > months (e.g in summer).
7 > > >
8 > > > 1123 packages (440 in dev-python category) from 108 categories
9 > > > specify dev-lang/python or virtual/python in DEPEND or RDEPEND, so
10 > > > actually it might be better to start filing bugs in this month. If
11 > > > there are no objections, then I would like to file 1 bug per
12 > > > category (except dev-python category).
13 > >
14 > > Make trackers and make one bug per package. Its way too hard to
15 > > follow a huge metabug with a bunch of packages listed in it.
16 >
17 > Average number of non-dev-python packages handled in 1 bug would be
18 > only 6.4, but I can create create 1 bug per package, if you still want
19 > it.
20
21 having done mass-filings with one bug per package in the past i know how
22 tedious these are. nevertheless, 1 package per bug it must be - it makes
23 all kinds of stuff way easier (think of retirements).
24
25 good luck and thanks.
26 Thilo

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: Python-3.2-related changes Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>