1 |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <Arfrever@g.o> said: |
2 |
> 2010-02-06 17:54:10 Mark Loeser napisał(a): |
3 |
> > Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <Arfrever@g.o> said: |
4 |
> > > 2010-02-05 17:40:00 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis napisał(a): |
5 |
> > > > I consider filing bugs for not adjusted packages after some |
6 |
> > > > months (e.g in summer). |
7 |
> > > |
8 |
> > > 1123 packages (440 in dev-python category) from 108 categories |
9 |
> > > specify dev-lang/python or virtual/python in DEPEND or RDEPEND, so |
10 |
> > > actually it might be better to start filing bugs in this month. If |
11 |
> > > there are no objections, then I would like to file 1 bug per |
12 |
> > > category (except dev-python category). |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > Make trackers and make one bug per package. Its way too hard to |
15 |
> > follow a huge metabug with a bunch of packages listed in it. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Average number of non-dev-python packages handled in 1 bug would be |
18 |
> only 6.4, but I can create create 1 bug per package, if you still want |
19 |
> it. |
20 |
|
21 |
having done mass-filings with one bug per package in the past i know how |
22 |
tedious these are. nevertheless, 1 package per bug it must be - it makes |
23 |
all kinds of stuff way easier (think of retirements). |
24 |
|
25 |
good luck and thanks. |
26 |
Thilo |