| 1 |
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:46:34 -0700 |
| 2 |
Denis Dupeyron <calchan@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
[...] |
| 5 |
> That said they were perfectly entitled to make the decision of not |
| 6 |
> wanting to maintain qt3 any longer. The only advice I can give is that |
| 7 |
> all disgruntled users and developers create a qt3 project and |
| 8 |
> adopt/unmask/re-commit the qt3 libraries for maintainers of packages |
| 9 |
> who need it. I doubt this will happen as this could have been done a |
| 10 |
> long time ago, but it's never too late. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Or like the old gtk-1: completely abandon the package and let the |
| 13 |
consumers upgrade slowly. IMHO this is the less annoying approach for |
| 14 |
everyone. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Alexis. |
Archives