| 1 |
On 02/26/10 22:02, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 02/26/2010 10:50 PM, Patrick Lauer (patrick) wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
>> src_test() { |
| 5 |
>> if hasq sandbox ${FEATURES}; then |
| 6 |
>> ewarn "zzuf tests don't work correctly when sandbox is enabled," |
| 7 |
>> ewarn "skipping tests. If you want to run the testsuite, please" |
| 8 |
>> ewarn "disable sandbox for this build." |
| 9 |
>> return |
| 10 |
>> fi |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Testing FEATURES from ebuild? You shouldn't do that. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I disagree. That's a good way not to fail there, unless someone has a |
| 15 |
better idea how to make that work. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
And I'd appreciate it if PMS would stop refusing to document FEATURES. |
| 18 |
(Double negative? I mean: PMS should document reality) |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I won't mind if someone "fixes" that in a way that still has the same |
| 21 |
functionality, but I honestly don't see it as a bug, so I'll leave it as |
| 22 |
it is. |
Archives