1 |
On Monday 21 May 2012 18:16:25 Markos Chandras wrote: |
2 |
> Excuse me but the way this change was handled is a bit depressing. |
3 |
> First, the ebuilds should have been fixed to inherit eutils and then |
4 |
> remove eutils from autotools. Now, a bunch of ebuilds are broken out |
5 |
> of nowhere. I don't believe this issue was that urgent in order to |
6 |
> justify the significant breakage of portage tree. |
7 |
|
8 |
you're assuming the breakage was intentional. i also wouldn't really describe |
9 |
it as "significant", but that's just quibbling over an insignificant aspect. |
10 |
|
11 |
but what's done is done. fix the ebuilds and move on. |
12 |
-mike |