Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Alex Legler <a3li@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in www-apps/drupal: drupal-5.23.ebuild ChangeLog drupal-6.19.ebuild drupal-6.16.ebuild drupal-6.17.ebuild drupal-5.22.ebuild
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:27:53
Message-Id: 20100817112713.58a60107@mail.a3li.li
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in www-apps/drupal: drupal-5.23.ebuild ChangeLog drupal-6.19.ebuild drupal-6.16.ebuild drupal-6.17.ebuild drupal-5.22.ebuild by Peter Volkov
1 On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:46:10 +0400, Peter Volkov <pva@g.o> wrote:
2
3 > В Пнд, 16/08/2010 в 18:04 +0000, Alexey Shvetsov (alexxy) пишет:
4 > > alexxy 10/08/16 18:04:52
5 > >
6 > > Modified: ChangeLog
7 > > Added: drupal-5.23.ebuild drupal-6.19.ebuild
8 > > Removed: drupal-6.16.ebuild drupal-6.17.ebuild
9 > > drupal-5.22.ebuild
10 > > Log:
11 > > [www-apps/drupal] Version bump
12 >
13 > Always reference bug number and mention people that spent time
14 > reporting problems in our bugzilla. Please, add bug # and attribution
15 > into ChangeLog. Also with version bump it's always good idea to keep
16 > previous version to allow re-installation of previous versions in the
17 > case of regressions.
18 >
19 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=323399
20 >
21
22 That's rather https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=332541
23
24 I agree that the bug # should be referenced, but as for removing the
25 old versions, that's something we usually ask people to do after
26 bumping packages with security issues to minimize the risk of people
27 installing possibly vulnerable versions.
28
29 --
30 Alex Legler | Gentoo Security / Ruby
31 a3li@g.o | a3li@××××××××××.de

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies