1 |
* Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> schrieb: |
2 |
|
3 |
> I wonder if that case shouldn't be handled better with an huge ewarn so |
4 |
> people concerned would really run it in a benchmark environment, alone. |
5 |
|
6 |
ewarns should be circumvented (make it work w/o them), IMHO. |
7 |
|
8 |
I can imagine I'm not the only person who doenst want to keep |
9 |
an close eye on each single build/merge. |
10 |
|
11 |
In this concrete example, the package's build system is misdesigned. |
12 |
They shouldn't rely on runtime benchmarks for build time decisions |
13 |
in the first place - this is unpredictable. But this is not an |
14 |
issues distros should have to cope with. |
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
cu |
18 |
-- |
19 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
20 |
Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ |
21 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
22 |
Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: |
23 |
http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce |
24 |
Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: |
25 |
http://patches.metux.de/ |
26 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |