| 1 |
[completely offtopic from this thread, please fork thread if/when replying] |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> Since the advent of outside overlays and layman, |
| 5 |
> we've seen many more bugs that only got discovered when the tree was |
| 6 |
> synced with some developer overlay, or when a Great Unveiling was done |
| 7 |
> after limited, private, small scale testing (as with many GNOME and KDE |
| 8 |
> releases, not to point the finger). |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
If GNOME is involved, I would like you to point some fingers and tell |
| 11 |
us exactly where you think we went wrong; exactly which "Great |
| 12 |
Unveiling" are you talking about? If you don't tell us what we did |
| 13 |
wrong, you surely can't expect us to fix the problem :) |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
All GNOME releases are incremental, so in 99% of the cases, the |
| 16 |
migration path is straightforward. If as an hppa arch dev, if you were |
| 17 |
inconvenienced, we would like to correct the problem since it would've |
| 18 |
definitely affected other archs too (and we know how understaffed you |
| 19 |
guys are :) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
~Nirbheek Chauhan |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team |
Archives