Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Stratos Psomadakis <psomas@g.o>
Subject: Re: x32 fun pants
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 21:07:54 +0300
On 09/16/2011 06:06 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 09/16/11 10:58, Stratos Psomadakis wrote:
> > On 09/16/2011 10:48 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> >> On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:35:55 -0400 Mike Frysinger
> >> <vapier@g.o> wrote:
> >>
> >>>> PS why not merge all x86 abis into one keyword? because
> >>>> x86_32 x86_64 x86_x32 are only abis of x86. Also we dont have
> >>>> different keywords for different mips abis (64bit and 32bit
> >>>> ones)
> >>> that'd be nice :)
> >> Seems even acceptable. Not sane but acceptable. People tend to
> >> keyword packages both '~amd64 ~x86' testing them on amd64 only;
> >> amd64 users tend to get sad when someone keyworded a package
> >> '~x86' only.
> >>
> >> On the other hand, it'd be good to have ABI sub-keywords then.
> >> Something like 'x86:x86 -*' if a package is actually x86-only.
> >>
> > I guess there are only a few cases where a package should be
> > keyworded for eg x86, but not for amd64, so these few cases can be
> > handled by p.masks, right?
>
> > So, we can have a single x86 keyword, and a single x86 'parent'
> > profile, and subprofiles for x86(or x86_32), amd64, and x32.
>
> > I guess it's not that simple, but I think that's how the mips
> > profiles work?
>
> I am a bit confused by your proposal. Do you suggest to drop 'amd64'
> and use x86(parent)/amd64(subprofile)(for x86_64) instead?
>
Yeap.

And if we're going to use the same keyword for x32/amd64, we can just do
it for x86/amd64/x32 too. I don't think that there will be too many
differences.

-- 
Stratos Psomadakis
<psomas@g.o>

Attachment:
signature.asc (OpenPGP digital signature)
References:
x32 fun pants
-- Mike Frysinger
Re: x32 fun pants
-- Alexey Shvetsov
Re: x32 fun pants
-- Mike Frysinger
Re: x32 fun pants
-- Michał Górny
Re: x32 fun pants
-- Stratos Psomadakis
Re: x32 fun pants
-- Markos Chandras
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: x32 fun pants
Next by thread:
Re: x32 fun pants
Previous by date:
Re: udev and /usr
Next by date:
Re: Re: x32 fun pants


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.