1 |
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:39:01 +0200 |
2 |
Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 22:29:06 +0200 |
5 |
> Tomáš Chvátal <scarabeus@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Is it time yet? I still find a lot of packages that do not even respect |
8 |
> LDFLAGS yet - when all these get fixed to respect LDFLAGS, we will |
9 |
> probably find yet more packages that are problematic with --as-needed. |
10 |
|
11 |
When you fix those packages to respect LDFLAGS you'll already hit any |
12 |
as-needed issues that might exist since it's on by default in the dev |
13 |
profiles. Enabling it in the user profiles doesn't change that. |
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
-- |
17 |
fonts, gcc-porting, and it's all by design |
18 |
toolchain, wxwidgets to keep us from losing our minds |
19 |
@ gentoo.org EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 |