Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Canek Peláez Valdés" <caneko@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion for getting rid of udev
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 18:56:27
Message-Id: CADPrc82P+OG8h=700zduab7TM8Bv_fEGjUAdkVM=3oEo=dDaAw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion for getting rid of udev by Mike Frysinger
1 On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote:
2 > On Thursday 13 October 2011 12:30:06 Arun Raghavan wrote:
3 >> While I've seen a lot of whining about this whole issue, I certainly
4 >> haven't been seen any effort to actually solve the problem within the
5 >> existing framework. For example, if someone cares enough, why not
6 >> write a wrapper script to track down the programs and libraries at
7 >> runtime that actually do use /usr so it's easier to say "these
8 >> packages install rules that need / and /usr on the same partition".
9 >
10 > (1) udev has provided a workaround of sorts for this already: udevadm trigger
11 > --type=failed.  this is the udev-postmount init.d script.  (2) it's fairly
12 > trivial to locate most (all?) the failing rules with a single grep: grep /usr
13 > -R /lib/udev/rules.d/.
14
15 If this comment is true (haven't looked at the code):
16
17 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375263#c23
18
19 that trigger has been removed from udev.
20
21 Regards.
22 --
23 Canek Peláez Valdés
24 Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
25 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion for getting rid of udev "Canek Peláez Valdés" <caneko@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion for getting rid of udev Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>