| 1 |
Hi, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Wednesday 21 May 2003 11:20, Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
| 5 |
> Thanks for the clarification. I think that portage itself should be as |
| 6 |
> location independent as possible ( one fixed location will be necessary to |
| 7 |
> tell portage where to find the rest, but this location could be specified |
| 8 |
> optionally by an environment variable). Allthough I'm not responsible for |
| 9 |
> portage I encourage you to submit any patches to the extend of making |
| 10 |
> portage even more location independent. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Well, I'm working on it, and if I have this running, I will provide patches |
| 14 |
via gentoozilla ,). |
| 15 |
But first, I must learn a bit of snake language ;) |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
regards, |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
\sh |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives