Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: fox.eclass update
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 04:08:09
Message-Id: 20100916215121.4d0f77df@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: fox.eclass update by Mike Frysinger
1 On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 18:34:17 -0400
2 Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > On Thursday, September 16, 2010 15:41:27 Peter Volkov wrote:
5 > > В Чтв, 16/09/2010 в 15:29 -0400, Mike Frysinger пишет:
6 > > > > FOX_PV="${FOX_PV:-${PV}}"
7 > > >
8 > > > while you're here, i'd change to:
9 > > > : ${FOX_PV:=${PV}}
10 > >
11 > > Why? This looks less readable...
12 >
13 > only because your eyes arent tuned to it
14
15 What exactly is the advantage though? Is it something to do with command vs
16 assignment?
17
18
19 --
20 fonts, gcc-porting, we hold our breath, we spin around the world
21 toolchain, wxwidgets you and me cling to the outside of the earth
22 @ gentoo.org EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: fox.eclass update Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>