1 |
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 01:32:27PM +0100, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: |
2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
3 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Dne 25.1.2011 13:25, Markos Chandras napsal(a): |
6 |
> > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 01:13:06PM +0100, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: |
7 |
> >> How about creating a project (possibly a subproject of QA or something |
8 |
> >> else) that would help people do that? In case of no response from |
9 |
> >> maintainers just do your job, and that should get the tree converted |
10 |
> >> more quickly than setting a policy. |
11 |
> > Please don't! QA is way too understaffed. We ain't gonna convert any |
12 |
> > ebuilds. This has nothing to do with QA. Let maintainers handle this |
13 |
> Pavel does not ask for us to migrate the ebuilds, but the eclasses, wich |
14 |
> we do anyway now :) |
15 |
Then I am sorry |
16 |
> >> |
17 |
> >> My main point is that said "X should be Y" does not automatically make |
18 |
> >> it so. We'd have to think about the migration plan anyway. |
19 |
> >> |
20 |
> >> Paweł |
21 |
> >> |
22 |
> > @Tomas, I don't follow. You mean migrate existing ebuilds or use the |
23 |
> > latest EAPI from now on? |
24 |
> > |
25 |
> God no, when you do bump you use new eapi :) not retroactively revert |
26 |
> all ebuilds to latest. |
27 |
Ok that works for me. As Alex said, maybe a repoman warning would be a |
28 |
good start |
29 |
|
30 |
> |
31 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
32 |
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) |
33 |
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ |
34 |
> |
35 |
> iEYEARECAAYFAk0+wtoACgkQHB6c3gNBRYe0lACeI/ir1DEcoxIpL/l0TEjDr5IZ |
36 |
> smQAn2ydpf013aaqR94t7A6MYb7nkslF |
37 |
> =j9iM |
38 |
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
39 |
> |
40 |
|
41 |
-- |
42 |
Markos Chandras (hwoarang) |
43 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
44 |
Key ID: B4AFF2C2 |
45 |
Key FP: 660A 0742 84EC 26F1 9EDB F00A FA83 5A15 B4AF F2C2 |