On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 01:32:27PM +0100, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Dne 25.1.2011 13:25, Markos Chandras napsal(a):
> > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 01:13:06PM +0100, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> >> How about creating a project (possibly a subproject of QA or something
> >> else) that would help people do that? In case of no response from
> >> maintainers just do your job, and that should get the tree converted
> >> more quickly than setting a policy.
> > Please don't! QA is way too understaffed. We ain't gonna convert any
> > ebuilds. This has nothing to do with QA. Let maintainers handle this
> Pavel does not ask for us to migrate the ebuilds, but the eclasses, wich
> we do anyway now :)
Then I am sorry
> >>
> >> My main point is that said "X should be Y" does not automatically make
> >> it so. We'd have to think about the migration plan anyway.
> >>
> >> Paweł
> >>
> > @Tomas, I don't follow. You mean migrate existing ebuilds or use the
> > latest EAPI from now on?
> > 
> God no, when you do bump you use new eapi :) not retroactively revert
> all ebuilds to latest.
Ok that works for me. As Alex said, maybe a repoman warning would be a
good start

> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> 
> iEYEARECAAYFAk0+wtoACgkQHB6c3gNBRYe0lACeI/ir1DEcoxIpL/l0TEjDr5IZ
> smQAn2ydpf013aaqR94t7A6MYb7nkslF
> =j9iM
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 

-- 
Markos Chandras (hwoarang)
Gentoo Linux Developer
Key ID: B4AFF2C2
Key FP: 660A 0742 84EC 26F1 9EDB  F00A FA83 5A15 B4AF F2C2