Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Robert Buchholz <rbu@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: Robert Bradbury <robert.bradbury@×××××.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] 2.6.31 stable plans
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 04:23:07
Message-Id: 200911050523.01729.rbu@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] 2.6.31 stable plans by Robert Bradbury
1 On Thursday 05 November 2009, Robert Bradbury wrote:
2 > There was discussion on /. today about there being a potential bug
3 > which allows users to obtain root privileges. Apparently its been
4 > fixed in BSD but may still be a problem in RedHat distributions. It
5 > is supposed to be fixed in the kernel but only as of 2.6.32.
6 >
7 > Is the fix being back-ported to 2.6.31 or should people plan/attempt
8 > to run the kernel directly from kernel.org sources before they make
9 > it into the Gentoo releases?
10
11 I am not part of the kernel maintainers, but from what I see stabling a
12 2.6.31 release usually means stabling the latest released patch. I
13 assume Linux stable maintainers (upstream) will incorporate the NULL
14 dereference patch into an upcoming release (2.6.31.6?).
15
16 As far as exploitability is concerned, in default configurations of
17 gentoo-, vanilla- and hardened-sources this bug cannot be exploited to
18 escalate privileges beyond a kernel panic.
19
20 The security team is tracking the vulnerability in this bug:
21 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=291904
22
23 We have recently extended our team with Björn (asym) who will be working
24 closer with our kernel maintainers and improve developer (and user!)
25 tools to keep systems secure. But I won't spoil the fun of explaining
26 that in detail and leave it to him.
27
28
29 Robert

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature