| 1 |
Hi, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Wernfried Haas <amne@g.o>: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 05:36:08PM +0200, Micha?? Górny wrote: |
| 6 |
> > I don't think there's a reason to do so. We have ddrescue, and users |
| 7 |
> > should be encouraged to migrate to that. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Ah, found it (sys-fs/ddrescue, not sys-fs/dd-rescue) and it actually |
| 10 |
> does all the stuff that dd-rhelp does. |
| 11 |
> I guess in that case it's a good idea to let dd-rhelp go (probably |
| 12 |
> with a note to people like me who aren't aware that ddrescue does the |
| 13 |
> same job these days). |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Added to the mask entry. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
V-Li |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project |
| 21 |
<URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
<URL:http://gentoo.faulhammer.org/> |
Archives