1 |
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 12:51:55 +0200 |
2 |
Tomá? Chvátal <scarabeus@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Thursday 14 of April 2011 13:32:04 Kfir Lavi wrote: |
5 |
> > When i run world update, I usually don't really check all the |
6 |
> > written stuff. |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > If I do this, I'm sure a lot more Gentoo users do the same. |
9 |
> > So do expect people rebooting the machine without checking what |
10 |
> > your have wrote. |
11 |
> > This can be a major headache if you have few systems that are doing |
12 |
> > auto updates. |
13 |
> > I would solve this issue by stopping the emerge and getting the |
14 |
> > attention of the user. |
15 |
> > If I don't get the attention of the user, no openrc will be |
16 |
> > installed. It should be something like emerge -C ... 1 .2 3 4 5... |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> > To conclude, you can't issue such a change without proper |
19 |
> > confirmation from the user. |
20 |
> > |
21 |
> This was discussed multiple times, news items are to be read. |
22 |
> Users ignore elog informations/web announcements/... so it was agreed |
23 |
> that news item is agressive enough to user so they must read it. |
24 |
> If they don't do so it is just their fault. |
25 |
> And no runtime changing for portage where it expect some input is |
26 |
> seriously stupid idea, most of us script updates in batch and noone |
27 |
> would actualy read it. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> Never the less as I said we expect user to read that stuff and if he |
30 |
> does not he is on his own due to his dumb approach. |
31 |
|
32 |
Maybe we should underline our intention by having that policy |
33 |
documented in the installation handbook. A good place may be section 2 |
34 |
"Working with |
35 |
Gentoo" (http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=2). |
36 |
|
37 |
At least all newbies will stumble upon it once. |
38 |
|
39 |
Regards, |
40 |
Thomas. |