Archives
Archives
| From: | "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gentoo Development <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> |
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Manifest signing |
| Date: | Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:03:08 |
| Message-Id: | 4E848879.2050100@gentoo.org |
| 1 | Hi everyone, |
| 2 | |
| 3 | The issue of Manifest signing came up in #gentoo-hardened channel ... |
| 4 | again. Its clearly a security issue and yet many manifests in the tree |
| 5 | are still not signed. Is there any chance that we can agree to reject |
| 6 | unsigned manifests? Possibly a question for the Council to adjudicate? |
| 7 | |
| 8 | -- |
| 9 | Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. |
| 10 | Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] |
| 11 | E-Mail : blueness@g.o |
| 12 | GnuPG FP : 8040 5A4D 8709 21B1 1A88 33CE 979C AF40 D045 5535 |
| 13 | GnuPG ID : D0455535 |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Manifest signing | "Tony \\\"Chainsaw\\\" Vroon" <chainsaw@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Manifest signing | Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Manifest signing | enno+gentoo@××××××××××××××.de |