Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: Gentoo Development <gentoo-dev@g.o>
From: "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o>
Subject: Manifest signing
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:02:17 -0400
Hi everyone,

The issue of Manifest signing came up in #gentoo-hardened channel ...
again.  Its clearly a security issue and yet many manifests in the tree
are still not signed.  Is there any chance that we can agree to reject
unsigned manifests?  Possibly a question for the Council to adjudicate?

-- 
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail    : blueness@g.o
GnuPG FP  : 8040 5A4D 8709 21B1 1A88  33CE 979C AF40 D045 5535
GnuPG ID  : D0455535



Replies:
Re: Manifest signing
-- enno+gentoo
Re: Manifest signing
-- Fabian Groffen
Re: Manifest signing
-- Tony \"Chainsaw\" Vroon
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Lastrite: xfce-extra/xfce4-xfapplet-plugin
Next by thread:
Re: Manifest signing
Previous by date:
Lastrite: xfce-extra/xfce4-xfapplet-plugin
Next by date:
Re: Manifest signing


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.