Archives
Archives
| From: | Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo News file about GNOME 3.2's unmasking | ||
| Date: | Sun, 27 Nov 2011 07:26:54 | ||
| Message-Id: | CADqQcK5GQQ8rxs03xvHD7=0JNRCPtzmNarYbyz-iu=qWur2rpw@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo News file about GNOME 3.2's unmasking by Zac Medico |
||
| 1 | On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > GLEP 42 refers to GLEP 22, which says nothing of ~arch specifiers. The |
| 3 | > current portage code literally compares the news item's keyword to the |
| 4 | > current profile's ARCH variable, so ~arch specifiers will not match. The |
| 5 | > code is in the DisplayKeywordRestriction class: |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=blob;f=pym/portage/news.py#l326 |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Thanks for the information, I've committed the newsfile as is: |
| 11 | http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-news/2011/2011-11-27-gnome3-unmask/ |
| 12 | |
| 13 | PS: what do we have to do to get Display-If-Visible implemented? I |
| 14 | volunteer to do whatever I can. :) |
| 15 | |
| 16 | -- |
| 17 | ~Nirbheek Chauhan |
| 18 | |
| 19 | Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo News file about GNOME 3.2's unmasking | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> |