Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o>
Subject: Re: RFC: Gentoo News file about GNOME 3.2's unmasking
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 12:55:45 +0530
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote:
> GLEP 42 refers to GLEP 22, which says nothing of ~arch specifiers. The
> current portage code literally compares the news item's keyword to the
> current profile's ARCH variable, so ~arch specifiers will not match. The
> code is in the DisplayKeywordRestriction class:
>
>  http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=blob;f=pym/portage/news.py#l326
>

Thanks for the information, I've committed the newsfile as is:
http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-news/2011/2011-11-27-gnome3-unmask/

PS: what do we have to do to get Display-If-Visible implemented? I
volunteer to do whatever I can. :)

-- 
~Nirbheek Chauhan

Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team


Replies:
Re: RFC: Gentoo News file about GNOME 3.2's unmasking
-- Zac Medico
References:
RFC: Gentoo News file about GNOME 3.2's unmasking
-- Nirbheek Chauhan
Re: RFC: Gentoo News file about GNOME 3.2's unmasking
-- Mart Raudsepp
Re: RFC: Gentoo News file about GNOME 3.2's unmasking
-- Nirbheek Chauhan
Re: RFC: Gentoo News file about GNOME 3.2's unmasking
-- Zac Medico
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: RFC: Gentoo News file about GNOME 3.2's unmasking
Next by thread:
Re: RFC: Gentoo News file about GNOME 3.2's unmasking
Previous by date:
tkabber completely broken in stable
Next by date:
Re: woodpecker.gentoo.org maintenance / outage


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.