1 |
Karl Trygve Kalleberg <karltk@×××××××.no>, on Wed Aug 14, 2002 [03:54:21 AM] said: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> |
4 |
> On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Paul wrote: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> > As far as the copyright goes, if you _require_ me to |
7 |
> > give you my copyright in order to accept a submitted ebuild, |
8 |
> > well, thats fine. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> We only require that you license your ebuild under the GPL v2 or |
11 |
> later. Once we do changes to the ebuild file, we add the standard |
12 |
> Gentoo, Inc. copyright statement to the file. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> > Why is GPLing it not sufficient? |
15 |
> |
16 |
> It is. Anybody who tell you differently is lying :) |
17 |
> |
18 |
|
19 |
Hi; |
20 |
|
21 |
Thankyou very much for this clarification, and |
22 |
explaination. I think what had happened to me, was that I |
23 |
was simply relying upon the implicit copyright of authorship, and |
24 |
when that line that indicated I was the author was removed, that |
25 |
consistituted a change to the ebuild, and the gentoo copyright |
26 |
was added. If I put in an explicit copyright, I assume it |
27 |
would have been preserved... |
28 |
|
29 |
Paul |
30 |
set@×××××.com |
31 |
|
32 |
> |
33 |
> As for maintainership: There is currently no formalised concept of |
34 |
> maintainership. In time, this will most likely be remedied. |
35 |
> |
36 |
> |
37 |
> Kind regards, |
38 |
> |
39 |
> Karl T |
40 |
> |
41 |
> |
42 |
> _______________________________________________ |
43 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
44 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
45 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |