1 |
On Saturday 22 of August 2009 01:06:30 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 01:01:48 +0200 |
3 |
> |
4 |
> Maciej Mrozowski <reavertm@××××××.fm> wrote: |
5 |
> > That being said I don't like refraining from "return value approach" |
6 |
> > towards "exception handling approach" |
7 |
> |
8 |
> nonfatal's not an exception handling approach. Think of it as a utility |
9 |
> like 'nice', 'ionice', 'xargs', 'env' or 'hilite'. |
10 |
|
11 |
Le sigh.. |
12 |
Replacing return value with die ("throw") *and* providing 'nonfatal' as |
13 |
mechanism to catch and ignore what's been thrown is obviously "exception |
14 |
handling approach" (not literally that is, I don't have to recall the |
15 |
semantics of \" character) - every respected software engineer will see that. |
16 |
|
17 |
But on topic, if you want to participate in discussion, please refer to |
18 |
suggestions given by David, please. |
19 |
|
20 |
-- |
21 |
regards |
22 |
MM |