| 1 |
On Monday 21 May 2012 19:24:27 Francesco Riosa wrote: |
| 2 |
> 2012/5/22 Mike Frysinger: |
| 3 |
> > On Monday 21 May 2012 19:01:04 Francesco Riosa wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> 2012/5/22 Mike Frysinger: |
| 5 |
> >> > On Monday 21 May 2012 18:16:25 Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 6 |
> >> >> Excuse me but the way this change was handled is a bit depressing. |
| 7 |
> >> >> First, the ebuilds should have been fixed to inherit eutils and then |
| 8 |
> >> >> remove eutils from autotools. Now, a bunch of ebuilds are broken out |
| 9 |
> >> >> of nowhere. I don't believe this issue was that urgent in order to |
| 10 |
> >> >> justify the significant breakage of portage tree. |
| 11 |
> >> > |
| 12 |
> >> > you're assuming the breakage was intentional. i also wouldn't really |
| 13 |
> >> > describe it as "significant", but that's just quibbling over an |
| 14 |
> >> > insignificant aspect. |
| 15 |
> >> |
| 16 |
> >> It's intentional not to revert the change, it's significant because it |
| 17 |
> >> involve a number of significant packages like icu, vim and boost, some |
| 18 |
> >> of them already marked stable (from a fast grep from the one mentioned |
| 19 |
> >> in the previous posts). |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> > you've identified the broke things. so fix them. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> wanna give me commit access for few hours? |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
just join as a dev and get it over with ;P |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
> I've already done mass changes to the tree when introducing |
| 28 |
> virtual/mysql seem something doable the same way. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
seems people have already fixed most (if not all) errors related to |
| 31 |
autotools.eclass |
| 32 |
-mike |
Archives