| 1 |
W dniu 20.10.2011 10:47, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." pisze: |
| 2 |
> I've noticed |
| 3 |
> <http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/SecurityHardeningBuildFlags>, i.e. |
| 4 |
> Debian is starting to make more and more hardening features default, at |
| 5 |
> least for most packages. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Should we start doing that too? What are possible problems with that? It |
| 8 |
> seems like it's mostly about USE=hardened, right? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Hi, |
| 11 |
just a bunch of quick questions from a hardened newbie: |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
1) Is there are reason to do it beside "Debian is going to do it"? |
| 14 |
2) What's wrong with current approach i.e. having seperate hardened profile? |
| 15 |
3) What are the benefits for an average desktop user or high-performance |
| 16 |
cluster? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
While answering that, please skip things obvious like having "more |
| 19 |
secure box". |
| 20 |
Cheers, |
| 21 |
Kacper |
Archives