Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
W dniu 20.10.2011 10:47, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." pisze:
> I've noticed
> <http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/SecurityHardeningBuildFlags>, i.e.
> Debian is starting to make more and more hardening features default, at
> least for most packages.
>
> Should we start doing that too? What are possible problems with that? It
> seems like it's mostly about USE=hardened, right?
Hi,
just a bunch of quick questions from a hardened newbie:
1) Is there are reason to do it beside "Debian is going to do it"?
2) What's wrong with current approach i.e. having seperate hardened profile?
3) What are the benefits for an average desktop user or high-performance
cluster?
While answering that, please skip things obvious like having "more
secure box".
Cheers,
Kacper
|
|
