Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Norberto BENSA <nbensa@×××.net>
To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@×××××.net>, gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ISC-Bind inconsistancy
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 20:30:57
Message-Id: 200303141726.09476.nbensa@gmx.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] ISC-Bind inconsistancy by "Thomas T. Veldhouse"
1 On Friday 14 March 2003 02:34 pm, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
2 > Can anybody explain why bind-tools is at version 9.2.2 but bind itself is
3 > pinned at 9.2.2rc1? I don't understand this reasoning at all. I am a
4 > little unclear why there are two separate packages in the first place.
5 >
6
7 When was the last time you emerge synd'ed?
8
9 * net-dns/bind
10 Latest version available: 9.2.2
11 Latest version installed: 9.2.2
12 Size of downloaded files: 4,936 kB
13 Homepage: http://www.isc.org/products/BIND/bind9.html
14 Description: BIND - Berkeley Internet Name Domain - Name Server
15
16 * net-dns/bind-tools
17 Latest version available: 9.2.2
18 Latest version installed: 9.2.2
19 Size of downloaded files: 4,936 kB
20 Homepage: http://www.isc.org/products/BIND/bind9-beta.html
21 Description: bind tools: dig, nslookup, and host
22
23
24 BTW, the reason for the two packages is that few people want a name server in
25 their boxes, but almost every one want nslookup, host, dig, and other tools.
26
27 HTH,
28 Norberto

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] ISC-Bind inconsistancy Max Kalika <max+lists.gentoo-dev@×××××××××.edu>