| 1 |
On Tuesday 12 January 2010 15:51:28 Tomáš Chvátal wrote: |
| 2 |
> Your approach of adding new packages to main tree is that you add them |
| 3 |
> with empty metadata.xml and we have to remove them in few years because |
| 4 |
> they are steaming piles of bugs... |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
not that this is relevant at all to my point, but when i notice such bugs, |
| 7 |
i'll fix them. but if no one cc's me, then i dont generally notice. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> Lack of maintainer |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
incorrect |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> open bugs are valid reasons. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
the *type* of bug matters, not the existence of an open bug. take any number |
| 16 |
of the trivial QA bugs open related to an extra empty dir or split docs -- |
| 17 |
none are valid for punting an otherwise perfectly working package. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> And since WE want to enable as-needed as default at some time we need to |
| 20 |
> work on the bugs |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
which isnt going to happen |
| 23 |
-mike |
Archives