Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: tom@×××××××××××××××××××××.uk
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Yet another few ideas for Portage
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 10:17:52
Message-Id: 20040415101744.GA7811@orwell
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Yet another few ideas for Portage by tom@edgeoftheinterweb.org.uk
1 On 0, tom@×××××××××××××××××××××.uk wrote:
2 > - portage.cflags. As most know, some packages perform better with some
3 > CFLAGS. This might create problems in the sense that people will just
4 > filter out bad flags here, instead of posting them in bugzilla so they
5 > can be filtered by the ebuild itself. Still, it's an idea :)
6
7 Uff, what I meant to say was /etc/portage/package.cflags. Guess I wasn't
8 on very good form last night ;)
9
10 --
11 Tom Martin
12
13 GPG Public key: http://edgeoftheinterweb.org.uk/files/tom-gpg-public.txt
14 Key fingerprint = 055F A0F4 D4C6 AD9E 40E8 2EAC 8F92 A284 B5C4 FF89
15
16 IRC: slarti] ~ irc.freenode.net
17 JID: slartibartfast@××××.org