1 |
Le lundi 25 octobre 2010 à 19:44 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan a écrit : |
2 |
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 7:07 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
3 |
> <Arfrever@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> > I would like to suggest that setting Python 3.1 as main active version of Python be officially |
5 |
> > supported and recommended for Gentoo developers since 2010-12-01. Majority of packages supporting |
6 |
> > only Python 2.* have been prepared to work correctly in situation when Python 3.* is set as main |
7 |
> > active version of Python. I would like to encourage other developers to work on fixing remaining |
8 |
> > packages. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> |
11 |
> I do not think this is a useful expenditure of developer time. There's |
12 |
> absolutely no hurry to start using Python 3 since 99.9% of upstreams |
13 |
> do not have officially supported ports yet. We can revisit this when |
14 |
> the upstreams of half the packages in-tree start using Python 3 by |
15 |
> default (this will probably take more than a year). |
16 |
> |
17 |
|
18 |
to reply to you and Fabio, note that Arfrever is not suggesting you |
19 |
start using python3. |
20 |
|
21 |
He suggests you have it as your default python interpreter which does |
22 |
not mean applications will magically start using it. |
23 |
|
24 |
It will however allow easier spotting of application that have not been |
25 |
prepared by ebuilds to run correctly with /usr/bin/python |
26 |
or /usr/bin/env python being python3 by default. |
27 |
|
28 |
The fix is generally easy, lots of gnome ebuilds have been fixed for |
29 |
gnome 2.32 and we expect the situation to be fully handled when it will |
30 |
be unmasked. |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> |
34 |
Gentoo |