Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:18:21
Message-Id: 8b4c83ad0911060618r2b61c4b4w51238306b9c9a437@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations by "Petteri Räty"
1 On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 1:42 AM, Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote:
2 > In the past when smaller arches were not that active we used to mark
3 > Java packages stable after testing by at least one arch team. The
4 > probability to find arch specific issues in something like Java is not
5 > so high so I think arrangements like this are acceptable when the arch
6 > teams have problems keeping up.
7 >
8
9 I think the same should be extended to other languages such as Perl
10 and Python (unless they have portions which are C/C++)
11
12
13 --
14 ~Nirbheek Chauhan
15
16 Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com>