List Archive: gentoo-dev
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 20:49:10 +0200
Pacho Ramos <email@example.com> wrote:
> El sáb, 16-06-2012 a las 19:07 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
> > On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 18:30:55 +0200
> > Pacho Ramos <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > > El sáb, 16-06-2012 a las 18:09 +0200, hasufell escribió:
> > > > It breaks the useflag philosophy, IMO.
> > > >
> > > > Useflags were meant as switches. You can turn things on and off.
> > > > Pulling in optional dependencies via useflags does not allow the
> > > > user to turn something off when he sets USE="-foo" emerge
> > > > fuqbar. That should only be valid for virtuals or
> > > > meta-packages. And that's what those are for.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Maybe we could split them from RDEPEND to some kind of
> > > EXTRA_DEPEND (or something else) to fit this purpose.
> > There was already a lot of discussion about this and the community
> > didn't care enough to agree on one of the proposed solutions. You're
> > just reinventing one of them, with a new variable name and the same
> > disadvantages.
> Do you have a link to that old thread? Because current situation of
> relying on elog messages also has disadvantages