Archives
Archives
| From: | "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver | ||
| Date: | Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:14:17 | ||
| Message-Id: | 3375796.AWLuLamy3m@grenadine | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver by Kent Fredric |
||
| 1 | > "git cat-file -p $sha" is as close as you can get to commit objects |
| 2 | > without needing to write your own decompressing wrapper. But it gives |
| 3 | > the same results. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | Now, does the "signed data" also contain the parent sha? |
| 6 | |
| 7 | If yes, our discussion about rebasing is moot, because a rebase will in every |
| 8 | case destroy previous signatures. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | Andreas K. Huettel |
| 12 | Gentoo Linux developer |
| 13 | kde, sci, arm, tex, printing |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver | Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> |
| Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |