Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o>
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 17:12:46 +0200
> "git cat-file -p $sha" is as close as you can get to commit objects
> without needing to write your own decompressing wrapper.  But it gives
> the same results.

Now, does the "signed data" also contain the parent sha?

If yes, our discussion about rebasing is moot, because a rebase will in every 
case destroy previous signatures.

-- 
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
kde, sci, arm, tex, printing
Attachment:
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part.)
Replies:
Re: Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Rich Freeman
Re: Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Kent Fredric
References:
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Alexey Shvetsov
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Rich Freeman
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Kent Fredric
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Next by thread:
Re: Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Previous by date:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Next by date:
Re: Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver


Updated Jun 23, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.