1 |
Hi Alexis, |
2 |
|
3 |
> you did it the correct way but that's what happens when you're alone in a |
4 |
> team and are moving without reliable internet connection then emails & |
5 |
> other stuff start to pile up :/ |
6 |
|
7 |
I'm sorry, I did not want to be pushy in any way... :| |
8 |
|
9 |
> > * dev-tex/achemso(-1.0) should be masked and then removed, since |
10 |
> > texlive-2009 contains already version 3.3. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Feel free to last rite it; or better: step up as a maintainer and bump it |
13 |
> so that you'll be sure to always have the greatest version and don't |
14 |
> depend on texlive's yearly releases :) |
15 |
|
16 |
Lastrite is probably better in this case. Not much has changed recently and |
17 |
texlive is current afaik. |
18 |
|
19 |
> (and even better: join tex herd if you're interested in doing such bumps) |
20 |
|
21 |
Done, also tex@g.o. (Gimme more Bugzilla mails...) :) |
22 |
|
23 |
> > * I'd like to move dev-tex/revtex-4.1_p2 and its dependency dev- |
24 |
> > tex/natbib-8.31a from the sci overlay |
25 |
> > Would it be OK with you if I do any of this? |
26 |
> |
27 |
> yes though if its in texlive I usually want to remove them from the |
28 |
> texlive's bundle |
29 |
|
30 |
I see the separate ebuilds more as a temporary workaround for the few really |
31 |
needing bleeding edge... and will happily remove them again when texlive-2011 |
32 |
is out. The natbib ebuild might even become obsolete with texlive-2010 |
33 |
already, have not checked yet. I think most people will be happy with the |
34 |
texlive version, so we should keep it for simplicity. |
35 |
|
36 |
Thanks for the tips with the ebuilds; I'll go ahead in the next days. |
37 |
|
38 |
Best, Andreas |
39 |
|
40 |
|
41 |
-- |
42 |
|
43 |
Andreas K. Huettel |
44 |
Gentoo Linux developer |
45 |
dilfridge@g.o |
46 |
http://www.akhuettel.de/ |