| 1 |
Am 21.03.2010 18:06, schrieb Mike Frysinger: |
| 2 |
> On Sunday 21 March 2010 08:41:15 Thomas Sachau wrote: |
| 3 |
>> I see, that the sgml herd seems to be empty for a longer time, so i would |
| 4 |
>> like to ask, if someone wants to take that herd and the related ebuilds |
| 5 |
>> and bugs over or if we should delete that herd and assign related |
| 6 |
>> ebuilds/bugs to m-n. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> if someone were to step up, we'd have to undo any changes we just did. why |
| 9 |
> not add m-n to the herd definition. |
| 10 |
> -mike |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
What exactly do you suggest? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
My suggestion is to give people some time to join that herd (which had open bugs back from 2006!) |
| 15 |
for some time and if nothing happens, remove this unused herd and assign bugs and ebuilds to m-n, so |
| 16 |
people at least see, that those ebuilds are not maintained, instead of getting the false impression |
| 17 |
of maintainership by an empty herd. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Thomas Sachau |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
Archives