Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Glep 48 update (as nominated for next meeting)
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 14:35:11
Message-Id: 20110131143454.GA27212@comet.mayo.edu
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Glep 48 update (as nominated for next meeting) by Fabian Groffen
1 On 09:06 Mon 31 Jan , Fabian Groffen wrote:
2 > On 30-01-2011 20:31:24 -0600, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
3 > > On 22:11 Fri 28 Jan , Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
4 > > > So draft we would like to have implemented as Glep update is this diff:
5 > > > http://dev.gentoo.org/~scarabeus/glep-0048.diff
6 > > >
7 > > > Please comment and help us improve the "english" of the whole document
8 > > > so it gets accepted :)
9 > >
10 > > I think the question of whether a lead's decision can be revoked by a
11 > > majority vote of the team should be a global Gentoo policy and not
12 > > team-specific. I personally disagree that it should be possible, but
13 > > that is a separate decision from whether it should be a common process
14 > > across all of Gentoo.
15 >
16 > I already think there's too much time wasted on bureaucratic stuff that
17 > distracts us from actually getting work done.
18
19 <grins>
20
21 I agree with not having a bunch of rules. But I think that when they do
22 exist, they should at least be consistent.
23
24 --
25 Thanks,
26 Donnie
27
28 Donnie Berkholz
29 Sr. Developer, Gentoo Linux
30 Blog: http://dberkholz.com