1 |
* Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o> schrieb: |
2 |
|
3 |
> If it turns out there is no easier way of properly fixing this, |
4 |
> we may have to split poppler-utils out from poppler. |
5 |
|
6 |
ACK. Having separate packages for public libraries and utils |
7 |
which just happen to use these libs should be the default case. |
8 |
Not just because of circular deps - which, in 99.99% have |
9 |
absolutely _no_ technical reason, beside certain people's mental |
10 |
lazyness (at least that's what my about 20yrs swe experience |
11 |
shows up ;-o) - but also a matter of clean sw design. |
12 |
|
13 |
This should start at the source, so if upstream doesnt want to |
14 |
fix this, let's fork. (i'm hereby volunteering as maintainer). |
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
cu |
18 |
|
19 |
PS: please no "we're not debian"-flamewars ;-o |
20 |
-- |
21 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
22 |
Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ |
23 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
24 |
Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: |
25 |
http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce |
26 |
Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: |
27 |
http://patches.metux.de/ |
28 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |