| 1 |
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Maciej Mrozowski <reavertm@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Saturday 25 of June 2011 22:32:43 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: |
| 3 |
>> *DEPEND=" |
| 4 |
>> !<X-2.0 |
| 5 |
>> !Y |
| 6 |
>> <A> |
| 7 |
>> <B> |
| 8 |
>> ... |
| 9 |
>> <Z> |
| 10 |
>> a? ( <X> ) |
| 11 |
>> b? ( <Y> ) |
| 12 |
>> c? ( |
| 13 |
>> <J> |
| 14 |
>> <K> |
| 15 |
>> ) |
| 16 |
>> " |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> ^^ is actually the main point of my "ebuild formatting nazi" agenda (usually |
| 19 |
> followed by "oh why did you break formatting in my shiny ebuild!11, revert!" |
| 20 |
> chants by various developers in case I happened to touch packages of theirs). |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> I never understood the reason after keeping deps not sorted alphabetically |
| 23 |
> where order doesn't matter - it's like someone purposely made ebuild harder to |
| 24 |
> read - it's counter productive. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Well, the GNOME team likes to order it by "type" and "library |
| 28 |
heirarchy". So, libraries in one paragraph, then applications. Plain-C |
| 29 |
libraries first, followed by glib, and then glib-using libraries, and |
| 30 |
then gtk+, and gtk+-using libraries, then Python modules, etc. We also |
| 31 |
separate out lines with and without versions/blocks/use-conditionals |
| 32 |
in them to make them easier to read. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
~Nirbheek Chauhan |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team |
Archives