| 1 |
On Wednesday 23 April 2003 05:22 am, Spider wrote: |
| 2 |
> Development issues should be taken here, in public where people can get |
| 3 |
> along and discuss it or just shut up and watch it, but internal politics |
| 4 |
> and management, who's who's boss and who's boss did what and so on feels |
| 5 |
> rather better to have on -core.. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I agree with you...but I think some development issues are being discussed on |
| 8 |
gentoo-core (for example, the ebuild-maintainer reorganizations mentioned by |
| 9 |
Dan Armak earlier, or the signed portage tree work). Or even if they aren't, |
| 10 |
people have the impression that this happens. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Which is why I think my suggestion #1 is a good idea--even if all the |
| 13 |
listeners-in ever report is "Nothing of interest to gentoo-dev happened on |
| 14 |
-core this week," I think the knowledge that someone has the job of relaying |
| 15 |
developmental issues (and only such issues, no politics) would be enough to |
| 16 |
greatly improve community satisfaction. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
What do you think, Spider? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Evan |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives