From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver | ||
Date: | Thu, 24 May 2012 13:07:49 | ||
Message-Id: | 20120524140343.6fb3fc12@googlemail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver by Dirkjan Ochtman |
1 | On Thu, 24 May 2012 14:05:50 +0200 |
2 | Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> wrote: |
3 | > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
4 | > > In that regard, git is nothing like for instance svn, where |
5 | > > branches come at a much higher cost, as does merging between them. |
6 | > |
7 | > That's wrong. SVN branches are just about as cheap as git branches, |
8 | |
9 | [citation needed] |
10 | |
11 | -- |
12 | Ciaran McCreesh |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |