Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@...>
Subject: Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 14:03:43 +0100
On Thu, 24 May 2012 14:05:50 +0200
Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@...> wrote:
> > In that regard, git is nothing like for instance svn, where
> > branches come at a much higher cost, as does merging between them.
> 
> That's wrong. SVN branches are just about as cheap as git branches,

[citation needed]

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh
Attachment:
signature.asc (PGP signature)
References:
Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Michael Weber
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Dan Douglas
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Duncan
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Dan Douglas
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Duncan
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Dirkjan Ochtman
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Next by thread:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Previous by date:
Re: Re: autotools.eclass no longer inherits eutils; check your ebuilds!
Next by date:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.