On Thu, 24 May 2012 14:05:50 +0200
Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@...> wrote:
> > In that regard, git is nothing like for instance svn, where
> > branches come at a much higher cost, as does merging between them.
> 
> That's wrong. SVN branches are just about as cheap as git branches,

[citation needed]

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh