| 1 |
Stefan Schweizer wrote: |
| 2 |
> To my fellow Gentoo developers, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> in the Sunrise project we have some users who are ambitious and cotribute |
| 5 |
> more than a few ebuilds. Those regulars have the possibility to take the |
| 6 |
> ebuild quiz and acquire the title "Sunrise trusted committer". Those |
| 7 |
> sunrise committers can use extended bugzilla permissions to edit keywords |
| 8 |
> EBUILD and REQUEST for example in the maintainer-wanted@ and |
| 9 |
> maintainer-needed@ bugzilla region where usually developers clean up litle |
| 10 |
> or have no interest in spending time on. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I am not up to date, but I know that when the AT project was started, it |
| 13 |
wasn't possible to give out access on specific keywords but just the |
| 14 |
KEYWORD field as a whole. Not that it would make a difference, just |
| 15 |
mentioning it here... |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> All this is addressed and working with the current arch testers procedure. |
| 18 |
> The plan is to just treat Sunrise trusted committers the same as arch or |
| 19 |
> herd testers. The difference is that they operate on ebuilds of all |
| 20 |
> flavours that interest themself in the sunrise overlay and not on a certain |
| 21 |
> herd of packages. Neither do they focus on testing for a specific |
| 22 |
> architecture. Just coding is their work, not testing - which explains the |
| 23 |
> difference in the name. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Huh, I hope they will do testing :P |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Kind Regards, |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Simon Stelling |
| 31 |
Gentoo/AMD64 developer |
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives