1 |
On 03-01-2012 13:02:55 -0600, William Hubbs wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 01:50:25PM -0500, Olivier CrĂȘte wrote: |
3 |
> > I don't see what breakage would be caused by a big-bang update (move |
4 |
> > everything in /sbin,/bin/,usr/sbin to usr/bin and add symlinks. I really |
5 |
> > doubt any system has a /usr so tight that adding the couple things that |
6 |
> > are in / to /usr/bin would break it.. Btw, this also includes /lib* |
7 |
> > to /usr/lib*. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> I think the best way to do this part of it is going to be to just follow |
10 |
> the upstream packages. When they release a new version that installs in |
11 |
> /usr, just allow that to happen. Eventually there will be very little in |
12 |
> /{bin,sbin,lib}, maybe nothing besides a couple of symbolic links like |
13 |
> /bin/sh. |
14 |
|
15 |
What packages would that be? If you're thinking about coreutils, just |
16 |
trim down the ebuild by not moving some of the tools to /bin. Our |
17 |
ebuild makes it conform to FHS, not the coreutils buildsystem itself. |
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
-- |
21 |
Fabian Groffen |
22 |
Gentoo on a different level |