Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 19:13:38
Message-Id: 20120103191206.GP780@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr by William Hubbs
1 On 03-01-2012 13:02:55 -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
2 > On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 01:50:25PM -0500, Olivier CrĂȘte wrote:
3 > > I don't see what breakage would be caused by a big-bang update (move
4 > > everything in /sbin,/bin/,usr/sbin to usr/bin and add symlinks. I really
5 > > doubt any system has a /usr so tight that adding the couple things that
6 > > are in / to /usr/bin would break it.. Btw, this also includes /lib*
7 > > to /usr/lib*.
8 >
9 > I think the best way to do this part of it is going to be to just follow
10 > the upstream packages. When they release a new version that installs in
11 > /usr, just allow that to happen. Eventually there will be very little in
12 > /{bin,sbin,lib}, maybe nothing besides a couple of symbolic links like
13 > /bin/sh.
14
15 What packages would that be? If you're thinking about coreutils, just
16 trim down the ebuild by not moving some of the tools to /bin. Our
17 ebuild makes it conform to FHS, not the coreutils buildsystem itself.
18
19
20 --
21 Fabian Groffen
22 Gentoo on a different level

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr William Hubbs <williamh@g.o>